Archives

  • 2018-07
  • 2018-10
  • 2018-11
  • 2019-04
  • 2019-05
  • 2019-06
  • 2019-07
  • 2019-08
  • 2019-09
  • 2019-10
  • 2019-11
  • 2019-12
  • 2020-01
  • 2020-02
  • 2020-03
  • 2020-04
  • 2020-05
  • 2020-06
  • 2020-07
  • 2020-08
  • 2020-09
  • 2020-10
  • 2020-11
  • 2020-12
  • 2021-01
  • 2021-02
  • 2021-03
  • 2021-04
  • 2021-05
  • 2021-06
  • 2021-07
  • 2021-08
  • 2021-09
  • 2021-10
  • 2021-11
  • 2021-12
  • 2022-01
  • 2022-02
  • 2022-03
  • 2022-04
  • 2022-05
  • 2022-06
  • 2022-07
  • 2022-08
  • 2022-09
  • 2022-10
  • 2022-11
  • 2022-12
  • 2023-01
  • 2023-02
  • 2023-03
  • 2023-04
  • 2023-05
  • 2023-06
  • 2023-07
  • 2023-08
  • 2023-09
  • 2023-10
  • 2023-11
  • 2023-12
  • 2024-01
  • 2024-02
  • 2024-03
  • 2024-04
  • 2024-05

    • br Introduction Thorstein Veblen s deals with the psychologi

    2018-10-30


    Introduction Thorstein Veblen\'s deals with the psychological, social, and economic issues of how institutions influence people\'s behavior from an evolutionary perspective. For Veblen, neither individuals nor institutions are taken for granted; he analyzes each from the beginning of their existence. The focus of The Theory of the Leisure Class and a large number of Veblen\'s later writings is the social creation of habits of thought, institutions, and their consequences for the behavior of people in society. Veblen\'s first book resulted in a proliferation of studies on institution in other areas of economics. This approach was named later as institutional economics (Hamilton, 1919). Nowadays, studies in the Veblenian tradition are identified as “old” or “original” institutional economics. The psychological importance of original institutional economics is that it stresses acknowledgment of the ways individuals learn within a society that contains institutions (Dugger, 1980; Hodgson, 2003). Psychological insights in Veblen\'s theory rely on the American pragmatist school of philosophy (Edgell and Tilman, 1989; Twomey, 1998). Contemporaneously, this aspect has been analyzed more closely by what is recognized today as cognitive psychology (Hodgson, 1985; Melody, 1987; Redmond, 2006; Stein, 1997). With regard to issues usually analyzed by studies that take the psychology of Veblen\'s conspicuous consumer into account, habit in decision making plays a central role. Indeed, habit is a key element in Veblen\'s theory. Despite the importance of the place of habits in Veblen\'s conspicuous consumer approach, there are other important psychological elements in Veblen\'s conspicuous consumer psychology, such as instincts. The role of instincts in the Veblenian approach to decision making has been studied less. This paper intends to contribute toward this direction of study. The rest of this paper is organized as follows. Section 2 presents Veblen\'s concept of instinct by stressing its differences from the common-sense approach to what instinct means. In Section 2, a Veblenian instinct is introduced as an association between an inner impulse to behave with objects of the external world—taking purchase Rupatadine Fumarate into account, these objects are goods. This discussion indicates that habits and institutions show consumers how to associate an inner impulse with a good. Section 3 details the impact of habits and institutions on the conspicuous consumer\'s inner impulses–goods relationship by stressing the role of the leisure class in conspicuous consumer decision making. In doing so, it is possible to address the most important Veblenian instinct for the conspicuous consumer\'s decision making, the instinct of workmanship. Consequently, Section 3 introduces the role of emulation, social selection, and pleasure institutionally built. A few final considerations close the paper in Section 4.
    Instinct and the impulse–object relationship Veblen\'s writings have been documented and analyzed extensively. Generally, these studies examine Veblen\'s writings for their influence on institutional economics and methodological issues (Hodgson, 2004a; Mayhew, 1987; Peukert, 2001; Rutherford, 1984). With regard to institutional economics, Veblen\'s perspective takes into account the evolution of thoughts and behavior expressed in institutionalized procedures in a society. Concerning methodology, two topics are emphasized: the unfulfilled development of the Veblenian evolutionary approach (see Mayhew, 1998; Rutherford, 1998) and the abduction of Darwinism to the social field (see Cordes, 2007; Hodgson, 2004b, 2008). With regard to the conspicuous consumer\'s decision-making, Veblen\'s perspective is associated usually with the role of habits and institutions in the evolution of thought and behavior. For Veblen (1914), the prime manifestation of human behavior is conditioned by amoral inner impulses and by developing naturally endowed skills. The development of a decision-making framework and behavior is assisted by habits and institutions, but we take inner impulses into account in order to analyze Veblen\'s notion of instinct. Inner impulses are the motivation to behave, which can occur even before the conspicuous consumer learns to deal with the content of habits and institutions. Consequently, inner impulses are not a motivation to behave that comes from the external world but something that comes from inside the organism of the decision maker. To stress the counterpoint between the philosophical and psychological conceptualization and the Veblenian notion of instinct, we can take into account the notion of inner impulses of Sigmund Freud—a prominent psychologist of Veblen\'s time.